Contact Us
9101 N. Central Expwy.
Suite 600, Dallas, TX 75231
Tel: 214.827.2814
Location

    Breast Augmentation Recovery – Breast Implants Dallas – Board Certified Plastic Surgeon – Sam Jejurikar, MD – Dallas Plastic Surgery Institute

    Tag Archives: breast augmentation Plano

    Breast augmentation is an intensely gratifying procedure for patients, as they see immediate results after the procedure.  Like any surgical procedure, though, patients need to allow some time for recovery.

    Recovery is variable from patient to patient. Most patients feel tired and sore after breast augmentation surgery, but this usually passes in a day or two. Many patients return to work within the week.  After a week, most patients have mild fatigue and soreness, but no other significant symptoms.

    Surgeons vary in the amount of time they restrict their patients from exercising postoperatively.  I ask my patients to refrain from all vigorous exercise for 2 weeks postoperatively and from all upper body exercises for 4 weeks.  Patients don’t always want to comply with this, as they feel relatively normal well before their postoperative restrictions are lifted.

    Scars from breast augmentation incisions will begin to fade in a few weeks and will continue to fade for months or years.

    Many of my patients ask how I choose the optimal size for a breast implant. Some women are very concerned about choosing too large of an implant, as they know this can make their breasts look unnatural. Other women worry that they won’t choose a large enough implant to see a discernible difference. To address these concerns, I use a variety of tools and techniques to help my patients select the best breast implant size:

    Photos

    Having patients bring photos of breasts they like and breasts they dislike helps me determine their goals. Visual references are invaluable in understanding each patient’s aesthetic preferences. Some women desire subtle enhancement, while others want a much more dramatic enlargement. By reviewing these photos together, I can better tailor my recommendations to their vision.

    Measurements

    Accurate measurements of the chest wall diameter, breast width, and breast height are crucial. These factors ensure the implant fits the patient’s anatomy. The breast skin envelope has natural limits; selecting an implant that is too large can cause it to sit too high, too low, or too far to the sides, resulting in an unnatural appearance. Taking precise measurements allows us to avoid these pitfalls and achieve balanced, proportionate results.

    Trial Sizing

    In-office trial sizing is a less valuable tool, having being largely replaced by 3D imaging. Although not an exact science, trying on different implants in a bra provides patients with a rough idea of how their new breasts might look in clothing. This exercise often sparks important conversations about their goals and helps patients feel more confident about their choices.

    Conversation

    Every implant has unique characteristics, including shape and profile, which significantly impact the final result. For example, a high-profile implant creates a different appearance compared to a moderate-profile implant, even if they are the same volume. Through open and thorough conversations during the preoperative consultation, I ensure that patients understand these differences and how they align with their desired outcomes.

    3D Imaging with Crisalix

    One of the most exciting advancements in breast augmentation planning is the use of 3D imaging technology like Crisalix. This powerful tool allows patients to visualize their potential results in real time. By uploading images of their body, Crisalix creates a virtual simulation of how different implant sizes and shapes would look on them. This technology takes much of the guesswork out of the decision-making process and provides patients with a clearer idea of their future appearance, helping them feel more confident in their choice. To schedule a 3D breast augmentation consultation using 3D imaging, begin the process by clicking here.

    Intraoperative Sizing

    Even with careful preoperative planning, intraoperative sizing plays a vital role. During surgery, I often use trial implants and sit the patient up to evaluate the breasts from multiple angles. This step is especially important for patients with breast asymmetry, as it allows me to make real-time adjustments to achieve the best possible symmetry and aesthetic result.

    Combining Tools for the Best Outcome

    Each of these tools serves a unique purpose, and together, they provide a comprehensive approach to selecting the optimal breast implant size. My goal is always to create results that are both beautiful and in harmony with the patient’s body. By combining measurements, imaging, trial sizing, and conversation, I can help patients achieve the look they’ve always wanted with confidence.

     

     

    Almost all patients have several questions about the meaning of breast implant profiles.  Patients have seen pictures on the Internet of patients with breast augmentation results they liked and wanted the same style implants as in the pictures.  These patients had a limited understanding as to what breast implant profile refers, prompting this blog entry.

    The naming for implant profiles predominantly refers to smooth, round implants, which are the most common type of implants used for cosmetic breast augmentation.  The profile of the implant has nothing to do with the fill of an implant, with the vast majority of implants placed these days being cohesive silicone gel implants, otherwise known as “gummy bear” implants. The two major breast implant manufactures have different names for their implants.  Allergan refers to its implants as low, low plus, moderate, full and high profile.  Sientra has similar names, but also has a moderate profile plus implant, which is between its moderate and high profile implants. Motiva sticks with the same principles, but gets fancier with its names, referring to the implant profiles in the United States as mini, demi and full. In Europe, they offer an additional profile, Corse, which is the equivalent of an extra high profile implant.

    The profile of an implant equates to the projection of that implant.  For a given volume, the higher the profile, the fatter and narrower an implant is.  As a result, higher profile implants tend to provide more fullness and a rounder appearance to the upper portions of the breast.  Higher profile implants tend to be really useful in women with relatively narrow breasts who want significant enlargement of the breasts; in these women, if a low or moderate profile implant were selected, to achieve the desired volume may entail the implant riding into the underarm region.  In contrast, a patient with a wider build or wider breasts may find that high profile implants may fail to adequately fill their entire breast; they often times benefit from implants with lesser projection.  Higher profile implants also tend to be useful in women who desire a small breast lift without the incisions associated with a formal lift.

    In recent years, there has been a notable shift in the preferences of patients seeking breast augmentation, with increasing interest in low-profile and low-profile-plus breast implants. These implants are characterized by a wider base diameter and less projection compared to high-profile implants. This design creates a more natural, subtle enhancement that aligns with the growing trend toward understated aesthetics. Many patients are prioritizing proportionate results that complement their natural body contours rather than opting for the more pronounced, rounder look traditionally associated with higher-profile implants.

    The appeal of low-profile implants is also influenced by their suitability for specific body types. Women with broader chest walls often find that low-profile implants provide a harmonious fit that enhances their shape without looking artificial or out of proportion. Additionally, these implants are often favored by patients who wish to restore volume after pregnancy or weight loss while maintaining a soft, natural slope to the breast. As societal beauty standards continue to evolve, the demand for implants that achieve balanced, subtle results is expected to grow, making low-profile and low-profile-plus implants a significant choice in modern breast augmentation procedures.

     

    Understanding the Risks Associated with Breast Implants

    Breast implants are a popular option for enhancing breast size and shape, but like any medical procedure, they come with risks. These risks can range from mild to severe, depending on individual circumstances, implant type, and surgical technique. Here, we break down the potential complications and discuss differences among textured and smooth implants as well as saline, silicone, and Motiva implants.

    Mild Risks

    1. Pain and Discomfort:
      • Some patients may experience mild pain or tightness in the chest following surgery. This usually subsides within a few weeks as the body adjusts. (Occurs in approximately 20-30% of patients)
    2. Swelling and Bruising:
      • Swelling and bruising around the surgical site are common and typically resolve over time. (Occurs in up to 50% of patients post-surgery)
    3. Changes in Sensation:
      • Temporary changes in nipple or breast sensation, such as numbness or heightened sensitivity, can occur. (Reported in 10-15% of patients)

    Moderate Risks

    1. Capsular Contracture:
      • This occurs when scar tissue around the implant tightens, causing the breast to feel firm or appear distorted. It may require revision surgery. (Affects approximately 10-15% of patients)
    2. Rupture or Leakage:
      • Saline implants may deflate if ruptured, while silicone implants may require imaging to detect silent ruptures. (Rupture rates range from 1-5% over 10 years)
    3. Infection:
      • Infections around the implant site can occur, potentially requiring antibiotics or implant removal. (Occurs in 1-2% of cases)
    4. Seroma Formation:
      • Fluid accumulation around the implant may lead to swelling and discomfort. This may require drainage. (Reported in 2-5% of patients)

    Severe Risks

    1. Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (BIA-ALCL):
      • A rare but serious cancer of the immune system linked to textured implants. (Estimated at 1 in 2,200 to 1 in 86,000 for textured implants)
    2. Breast Implant Illness (BII):
      • A collection of systemic symptoms, such as fatigue, brain fog, and joint pain, reported by some patients. While not officially recognized as a medical condition, it has gained attention in recent years. (Prevalence unclear, but widely discussed in patient communities)
    3. Severe Implant Rupture Complications:
    • In rare cases, implant rupture can lead to significant pain and the need for immediate surgical intervention. (Rupture rates are low, with significant complications being exceedingly rare)

    Textured vs. Smooth Implants

    • Textured Implants:
      • Pros: Reduced risk of capsular contracture and better adherence to tissue, which helps them stay in place.
      • Cons: Higher association with BIA-ALCL and slightly rougher feel.
      • Risk of BIA-ALCL: Approximately 1 in 2,200 to 1 in 86,000, depending on the manufacturer and type.
    • Smooth Implants:
      • Pros: More natural feel and lower risk of BIA-ALCL.
      • Cons: Higher likelihood of shifting position over time and potentially increased capsular contracture risk.

    Saline vs. Silicone vs. Motiva Implants

    • Saline Implants:
      • Pros: Filled with sterile saltwater, easily detectable leaks, and lower surgical costs.
      • Cons: Firmer feel and higher likelihood of rippling. (Rippling reported in up to 10-15% of cases)
    • Silicone Implants:
      • Pros: More natural feel and appearance. Silicone gel maintains shape better in case of rupture.
      • Cons: Requires regular monitoring (e.g., MRI) to detect silent ruptures and higher initial cost. (Silent rupture rates estimated at 1-2% per year)
    • Motiva Implants:
      • Pros: Advanced technology with a natural feel, lower capsular contracture risk, and innovative safety features like microchip tracking.
      • Cons: Limited availability and higher cost compared to traditional silicone and saline implants. (Capsular contracture rates as low as 1-2%)

    Conclusion

    Understanding the risks associated with breast implants and the differences among implant types is crucial for making an informed decision. Patients should discuss their goals, medical history, and concerns with their surgeon to determine the best option for their needs. While risks exist, choosing an experienced surgeon and following post-operative care instructions can significantly improve outcomes and minimize complications.

    Contact

    Contact

    Our Location Dallas Plastic Surgery Institute

    9101 N. Central Expwy.
    Suite 600, Dallas, TX 75231
    Tel: 214.827.2814
    Dallas | Dr. Jejurikar

    Stay Connected

    Ready to get started?
    Request a Consult